Showing posts with label air defense. Show all posts
Showing posts with label air defense. Show all posts

Monday, May 18, 2026

ECM can make drones more effective and protect them against air defense.



Images: InterestingEngineering


The new ECM systems can help improve the drone's survivability. The Storm Shield system. It is an adaptable ECM system. That fits into many platforms. The system can turn drones much more dangerous than ever before. In the same way as the table-sized GPU-based computers. That can run complex codes can bring new independence to drone systems. This means that ECM and drones are the ultimate combination. And the defense is far behind what it should be. 

The problem with the defense is always simple. All defense systems are planned. To use against large targets. Small-sized drones that operate as swarms can be tools. That suppresses air defense very effectively. The drone swarms require larger carriers. So the large-sized drones can deliver those drones over the target areas. The purpose of those drones is to carry the miniature drones into strike distance. 

Similar systems, like the Storm Shield, can be modified to communicate with drone swarms. The high-flying aircraft can search for drones using AI-boosted visual, infrared, and radar scanners. In some visions, the drone-based ECM can include a miniature version of the “Doomsday Airplane”. The flying USB stick that can reprogram other drones. 

There is a possibility that Russia tries to redirect Ukrainian drones to Finland and the Baltic on purpose. That can happen by using falsified location information. This means that they replace the GPS or Starlink. By using GLONASS signals. Another way. It could be that Russia tries to hack the guidance consoles. 

So they try to take drones under their control. Or when drones turn in a certain direction. They put the jammers on. This should cause a situation. That those drones continue in a straight direction. Or in some scenarios, Russians try to slip their own drones into those drone swarms. That. Those drones seem to come from Ukraine. 

Could Russia make things like fast-reacting hacking? Maybe, maybe not. But they might try those things. 






Images (Interesting Engineering, E-Bombs: The Allure and Peril of High-Power Microwave Weapons)


The problem with drone defense is this. There are so many drones. The air defense can use all its ammunition. In some scenarios, drones are used. To force. The air defense is to shoot all its ammunition. The rockets and missiles are good tools. But the problem is. The limited number of ammunition. Laser systems and drones are the tools. That can make a better defense. 

The drone can also carry lasers. Or a so-called EMP-bomb. The EMP bomb that is installed in drones can destroy the air defense. The EMP systems don’t necessarily require explosives or nuclear blasts. The system. It can use the technology. That was created for the CERN LHC accelerator. 

The high-power microwave, HPM bomb, is the tool that can break almost all electronics in the target area. 

The system loads capacitors. And then. It releases that energy as a radio or microwave burst. In those cases, the explosives can press the battery or capacitor to maximize the energy load. But that is not necessary. 

The laser weapon can be installed on a high-flying drone. The lasers or EMP. Are tools. That can also destroy wire-optical drones. The EMP. That comes. From below. It can burn the microchips from the drones. The EMP can affect entire drone swarms. But if those beams hit the electric lines, they can cause a dangerous voltage spike. 

The high-power capacitors can be used. To create the high-power radio impulse that switches all electric systems off. The system is being used. Basically, similar technology. CERN uses its Large Hadron Collider, LHC. The system loads capacitors. And then it aims the high-power electromagnetic impulse, radio waves, or microwaves at the target. In the same way. The drone can use an EMP to shut down the defense. 


https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/hpm.htm


https://interestingengineering.com/military/electronic-warfare-tech-unmanned-systems-operation


https://interestingengineering.com/innovation/e-bomb-peril-high-power-microwave-weapons


http://www.superconductors.org/emp-bomb.htm

Wednesday, December 24, 2025

Dead man's hand denies air strikes to Russia.


There is a tale in the Interesting Engineering that the U.S and its allies can destroy all Russian nuclear sites in less than two hours. The problem is that two hours is too long a time, and the Russian command system has time to launch missiles. The thing. The Western military commanders are afraid. Called: “Perimeter”. The dead hand trigger. If the Russian nuclear strike capacity turns too low, the dead man's hand can open fire with ICBM missiles. 

Also, if the commanders of that monstrous force are to be declared dead. The “Perimeter” starts the launching procedure. Two hours is too late to deny that operation. The problem is that the ICBM missiles can also be mounted on trains or on road-based launching systems. Those systems can be very hard to find. Things like missile submarines can make the launching operations. 

In addition to the USA, the Russian missile command comprises three or four parts. 


1) The ground-based tactical missiles. Those missiles. Like. Kalibr (CLUB-K) and the Iskander are highly mobile battlefield systems. 


2) Tactical and strategic bombers that can launch air-to-surface missiles and drop more or less free-fall bombs. 

3) Nuclear submarines and conventional submarines with nuclear strike capacity. Those submarines can launch nuclear cruise missiles and ballistic missiles. 

4) Silo-based and highly mobile intercontinental ballistic missile systems. Those systems. Like R-36M2 (SS-18), RS-28 (Sarmat), and RS-24 Yars(SS-27 mod 2 or SS-29). The last one is the mobile system that can be driven out. From bases very fast. Yars system replaced the RT-2P (Topol, and Topol M (”M for mobile”)) missiles. 

The remarkable thing about the Russian missiles is this. Those missiles are equipped with much more powerful warheads than Western missiles. And another thing is that. Russia's defense leans more toward nuclear weapons than Western defense. And the conventional troops' failures in the Ukraine war are growing nuclear weapon value for Kremlin leaders. 




Artist’s impression. Tu-95 launches Kh-55 missile (Wikipedia) 


The RT-2PM missiles are now mentioned as retired. But. The Russian inventory is not similar. To the Western. And it's possible that some of those missiles are still somewhere. The fact is that the new nuclear-powered “Skyfall” missiles are also coming to the arsenal. 

It’s possible that RS-28 Sarmat, which has some kind of technical problems, is “only” SS-18 with a new hypersonic “Avangard” glide warhead. The RS-28 “Sarmat” carries 16 warheads. Or in a lower payload, those systems can operate as FOBS (Fractional Orbital Bombardment Systems). 



Sarmat missile. 

The problem with Russian air-launched missiles is that their carrier vehicles, Tu-95 (Bear-H), Tu-22M (Backfire), and Tu-160 (Blackjack), are quite old systems. The Su-34, Su-35 (Improved Flanker), and MiG-31 (Foxhound) can also carry those missiles. The same aircraft can also carry hypersonic Kh-47M2 “Kinzhal” missile, and especially its nuclear strike variant. The problem is that those aircraft have limited operational time. The MiG-31 is the only one of those aircraft that can accelerate the Kinzhal missile to hypersonic speed. Normally, those missiles. Operational launching platforms are Tu-22M3M and MiG-31. 

The Tu-160 can carry nuclear-powered 9M730 Burevestnik  (SSC-X-9 “Skyfall”) missiles. The nuclear reactor makes it problematic to defend against those missiles. If the reactor damages those systems. Can deliver radioactive material all around the area. And the “Skyfall” missiles can probably be installed on board the Oscar and Kilo-class. And more modern submarines. Like Akula and Yasen-class boats.  The Sarmat missile has faced problems, but nuclear-powered cruise missile tests have succeeded. And the Yasen-class submarine is in the U.S. backyard with Mach 9 hypersonic missiles. 

"Nuclear engine-powered unlimited range Burevestnik missile illustration The Burevestnik missile is launched by a conventional rocket motor while the nuclear reactor powered engine takes over in flight providing it unlimited range and loitering ability." (DefenseMirror.com)



The problematic system is also a long-range “Poseidon” torpedo. A 50-100mt nuclear warhead makes those nuclear-powered underwater weapons very devastating. They can form a tsunami that causes very bad destruction. It’s possible that the Poseidon underwater unmanned vehicle (UUV) patrols the oceans.  And if it loses its contact with the base, it starts to make an attack. 

The older, Cold War-era Kh-55  (AS-15 “Kent”)  cruise missiles are similar to the retired Boeing AGM-86. The AS-15 is partially replaced by the Kh-101 (AS-23 “Kodiak”) nuclear cruise missile. The Kh-102 is a nuclear warhead, a long-range variant of the Kh-101 missile. All other than Kh-102 were used in the Ukraine war. 

The Russian nuclear strategy. Based on the political control. Possibility to use. Nuclear weapons require that those weapons exist. 

Every time a nuclear submarine or nuclear bomber is out from base, it’s possible that those pilots talk about something that they should not talk about.  Another thing is that Kremlin leaders know the value of nuclear weapons. They know that nuclear power denies the outside military operations in Russia. 


https://www.19fortyfive.com/2025/12/the-russian-militarys-unstoppable-sarmat-icbm-just-failed-again-and-badly/


https://www.19fortyfive.com/2025/12/russias-yasen-class-attack-submarine-is-in-americas-backyard-with-a-mach-9-hypersonic-punch/


https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2024-11/news/sarmat-failure-casts-doubt-russian-heavy-icbm

https://defensemirror.com/news/35154/Russia_Claims_Testing_Complete_of__Burevestnik__Nuclear_powered_Cruise_Missile

https://www.defencetoday.com/security/military-capabilities/russia-tests-nuclear-powered-nuclear-armed-burevestnik-cruise-missile/


https://edition.cnn.com/2024/09/24/europe/russia-sarmat-missile-test-failure-intl


https://interestingengineering.com/military/us-allies-edge-over-china-russia


https://www.technology.org/2025/12/02/putins-doomsday-rs-28-sarmat-crashes/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9K720_Iskander


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9M730_Burevestnik


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akula-class_submarine


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kh-47M2_Kinzhal


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kh-55


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kh-101


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mikoyan_MiG-31


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscar-class_submarine


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poseidon_(unmanned_underwater_vehicle)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-36_(missile)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS-24_Yars


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT-2PM_Topol


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-35


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-22M


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-95


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-160


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yasen-class_submarine




Billiard balls and quantum computers.

A single billiard ball could simulate a universal Turing machine (UTM). That machine could simulate any other Turing machine. This is one of...