Curvity is the new way to control the drone swarms.

 Curvity is the new way to control the drone swarms. 

"Illustration of robots advancing artificial swarm intelligence inspired by the collective behaviors of birds, fish, and bees."(Rude Baguette, “Curvity Controls Robot Interactions”: Researchers Develop New Framework Allowing Robotic Swarms to Mimic Bird and Fish Group Behaviors)

Drone swarms could be the tool that can make almost everything. The idea is that drones can cooperate and connect their computing capacity when they must make complex decisions. Then the swarm can share missions to individual drones. When we think about robot swarms that can mimic things like bird swarms, those robots must know their position in the swarm. The answer to that question can be curvature or curvity. Rude Baguette tells the next things about curvity. 

“A key innovation of the study is the introduction of a new quantity termed “curvity.” This intrinsic charge-like quality allows a robot to curve in response to external forces, guiding its interactions with fellow robots. Each robot is assigned a positive or negative curvity value, which determines its behavior within the swarm. This innovative approach allows for the collective behavior of the swarm to be controlled, whether it involves flocking, flowing, or clustering.”  (Rude Baguette, “Curvity Controls Robot Interactions”: Researchers Develop New Framework Allowing Robotic Swarms to Mimic Bird and Fish Group Behaviors)

Assistant Professor Stefano Martiniani from New York University emphasized the potential of this approach: “This curvature drives the collective behavior of the swarm, potentially controlling whether the swarm flocks, flows, or clusters.” Such a model transforms the challenge of controlling swarms from complex programming into a material science issue, opening new avenues for research and application.” (Rude Baguette, “Curvity Controls Robot Interactions”: Researchers Develop New Framework Allowing Robotic Swarms to Mimic Bird and Fish Group Behaviors)

Sharing the system into substructures that mimic galactic groups makes it easier to create programs for robots. Each layer or level acts as one robot. 

The system can involve the next type of information. 

“You are a robot of robot group 9. Robots 1 and 2 must be ahead of you. And robot 4 must be on the left side of you. Together, you are Robot Swarm 2, and Swarms 1 must be on your side, and Swarms 3 and 4 must be behind you. Together, your place is in layer 3. That layer must be between layer 2 and 4.” Then the system has other algorithms that tell what to do if one drone is lost. 

The key question is how the robot can determine its position within the swarm. In this case, the modular structure is the solution. There can be multiple data levels, which makes the data structure operate as a mosaic. Or, rather, we can say that the structure mimics the universe. There are individual drones that are galaxies in galactic clusters. Then those drone clusters form a local cluster. Then, local clusters form a super cluster. And then the superclusters form a global cluster. Those clusters are the drone swarms. The ability to share the groups into subgroups makes it easier to program those drones. 

The idea is that the drones can form three or four drone groups. The individual drone knows. What drones are behind it, and what drones are ahead of it? The drone group acts like one drone. And then it must know what drone group is ahead and behind it. Then the drone group must know. Whether it should be above or below some of the other drones. The system can make that quite easily. It can share the drone swarm into layers. And those drones know their own layer. And then they know what drones should be below and what should be above it. Those drones can operate in squares. That can look like randomly changing forms. 

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/09/curvity-controls-robot-interactions-researchers-develop-new-framework-allowing-robotic-swarms-to-mimic-bird-and-fish-group-behaviors/

How to simulate the entire universe using a laptop?

    How to simulate the entire universe using a laptop? 

How to simulate the entire universe using a laptop? And can psychohistory be possible? 

The idea is this. If we want to simulate a large entirety, we must not have high accuracy. If we want to make a simulation about. How a river flows, we can use the entire river as a model. We must not care. About how a single water molecule or subatomic particle behaves. We must only know where the river flows. To make a prediction about how the river will flow, we must only know where the softest rock is to predict the channel that the river will choose. In meteorology, supercomputers can make very good predictions. If they know the forces that affect the air. In those cases, the system. Look at the entirety. It doesn’t try to make a precise and highly accurate model of how a single water droplet interacts. The system observes the large entireties. Like cloud groups to make a model, how the air mass will behave. 

Weather satellites and computers are good tools. To predict how large hurricanes behave. But those systems are helpless. When they must try to predict how tornadoes will form. Tornadoes are smaller but more destructive than large tropical storms. Tornadoes are too small for weather satellites.

Maybe. The same programs can make predictions of tornadoes. If the system uses so-called atmospheric satellites that observe smaller areas but with higher accuracy. Those systems will get information from smaller areas. But they can use similar computer systems. Researchers used to make a large-scale weather forecast. In this case, it's easy to make a planet-scale weather forecast. But those forecasts are inaccurate. 

In the same way, it's easy to make predictions about how large gas mass behaves. The system removes unnecessary accuracy and handles things like galaxies as solid forms. Those are like pins in the large system. Or maybe we should say that galaxies are like wheels. Those wheels move wave movement, fields, and large material masses over the universe. 

That means if we make inaccurate, “about” predictions. About how large gas masses are. Like galactic superclusters behave, we can make that prediction using laptop computers. In an inaccurate model, we can think that galactic superclusters are the wheels, and the universe is like a ball around those wheels. When the system starts to simulate how the galaxies behave in a local cluster. The system uses the local cluster as a scale, and galaxies are wheels. When the system makes a model of how a galactic supercluster behaves, the local clusters are the wheels. And the last version is the universal scale. The galactic superclusters are the wheels. In the large-scale simulations. The system doesn’t notice or filter out too small actors that have no visible effect on the system. 

This system is called. A variable scale model. The idea is similar to the U.S map. If we want to look at the overview of the weather over the USA. We can use the USA as a whole. But if we want to see what the weather is over in Montana. We can take a Zoom image of the state of Montana. We can use the same computer algorithms in that area. As in larger-scale images. But the higher accuracy means that we lose the entirety. 

Ludwig Boltzmann (1844-1906), Austrian physicist

Can the psychohistory turn true? 

There is a possibility that the same models. Those used for simulating the universe can be used to predict how humans behave. That is called psychohistory. In the SciFi series: “The Foundation”. The idea is that the system predicts the behavior of large human groups. The system uses large human groups. And things like their states’ influence as variables that can predict how people behave. The system makes models. Using billions of people. But if that thing is possible. The system can use the same algorithms for smaller groups. 

In psychohistory, the system looks at things. That happened in the past. Then the system searches for what those things caused. And then. The system searches for details of similar events from its environment. Because people with similar personalities should behave in similar ways in similar situations. So, the system must know. How many certain types of personalities live in an area that faces certain changes? We can think. Human groups have a certain social or psychological mass, and if a certain number of people start behaving in certain ways. That psychological mass can start to pull other people with it, only if it's large enough.

The thing that causes panic is that a certain number of people in a group start to panic. When we think that four people start to panic, that might not seem like a very big thing. But if there are 10 people in one room. And there is one square meter of space. For each person. Then four people will get the larger effect. And one of those reasons is that. There is no outside effect that can suppress the panic effect. And that makes it stronger. If the head of state goes into panic, that can escalate into a very large group. If one single person goes into panic, that has no such effect. 

And then to psychohistory: can we predict how people or nations behave? Every person. With a certain personality. Behaves in certain ways. The thing that makes predictions hard. Is that. We should know. What a person’s personality is. And that’s impossible if the researchers don’t know the entire personal history of the person. 

We can take the scale of millions or billions of people. When we think about psychology and economics. There are inaccuracies. The reason for those inaccuracies is that we don’t know every person’s background. People’s experiences model our behavior. Psychological models are almost right. And they work with most people. But those models are not working with people. Whose nature is not known. We don’t know what type of humans they are if we don’t know that person’s complete history. The personality is unknown, if there is something hidden in history. 

But there should be a certain number of  non-predicted cases. Or a certain type of standard deviation  of cases that behave in a non-predictable way. This means that large, scalable surprises are not very common cases. in large-scale models. Cases like the Kennedy assassination are very rare. They are like black swans, possible but extremely rare things. There must be an acceptable  error level in all models. Some of those black swans can be predicted. We can calculate the possibilities of asteroid hits, but there is a possibility. That some asteroids can come through the defense. Sometimes asteroids are seen. Only when they pass Earth and those things cause problems. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-just-found-a-way-to-simulate-the-universe-on-a-laptop/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_constant

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludwig_Boltzmann

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychohistory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_temperature_and_pressure

Researchers sent quantum information through the commercial network.

 Researchers sent quantum information through the commercial network.

“A Penn team has shown that quantum signals can ride alongside everyday internet traffic on commercial fiber. Their “Q-chip” experiment marks a step toward a scalable quantum internet with world-changing potential. Credit: Shutterstock” (ScitechDaily,Engineers Bring Quantum Internet to Commercial Fiber for the First Time)

*******************************************************************************

“A new integrated chip demonstrates how quantum networks could communicate using today’s internet protocols over existing commercial fiber-optic cables.”

“In a groundbreaking experiment, engineers at the University of Pennsylvania successfully extended quantum networking beyond the laboratory by transmitting signals over commercial fiber-optic cables using the same Internet Protocol (IP) that drives today’s web. Published in Science, the study demonstrates that delicate quantum signals can travel on the same infrastructure that carries routine online traffic. The tests were carried out on Verizon’s campus fiber-optic network. “

(ScitechDaily,Engineers Bring Quantum Internet to Commercial Fiber for the First Time)

*******************************************************************************

Researchers have introduced a method that allows sending quantum information alongside binary information. That is a significant step toward creating new and more secure quantum networks that can enhance communication safety. And that can make it possible to create new and powerful quantum computers, where those computers can send data in the form of a qubit. There is a possibility. To send a qubit along with binary data using a very thin light wave or laser beam. Then the photon, where the system stored information. Travels around that light string. The quantum information is stored in the photon. And that makes it possible to transport data in the quantum model over long distances. 

But the reality is this. The system must protect data that is stored in a qubit. It’s possible that the system can transport data in a regular optical cable in quantum form. The system can share information between optical fibers. And that forms the virtual qubit. In this case, we can think about the optical cable. There is one fiber in the center and five fibers around that central fiber. The system can share information with the fibers around the central fiber. That means those optical fibers around the central fiber act as a virtual photon. The ability to transport secured information over long distances is a key element in modern communication. 

Photonic data transmission and computing are the new tools for computing. Photonic communication makes networks immune to regular ECM systems. If we use quantum communication. The quantum system increases security to a level that we have never seen before. When information moves from a qubit to a sensor, the qubit loses its energy level. If a qubit travels in a fully controlled environment, the system can calculate how its energy level changes. 

When something looks at the qubit, it changes the energy level or destroys the entire dataset. When a qubit travels in its quantum channel, the system must touch it so that it can release information stored in its internal superposition. That can happen using radiological stress that can force the qubit to release its information. Or the system must make a qubit to send its information to another particle. But that destroys information from the qubits. And in fully secured data transmission, the system can transport information, sharing it with multiple qubits. 

Coherent radio waves can make it possible. Researchers can create room-temperature quantum computers. The system can use different radio frequencies to make the qubit. Each radio frequency in coherent radio waves is one of the qubit states. 

But we know that the photonic data transmission is only one of the ways. To make quantum data transportation. It’s possible to send the data through the hollow nanotubes or hollow metal cables. The system can use coherent radio waves and skyrmions. That travels around that electromagnetic fiber. The structure around the channel protects the signal from outside influence. 

The data that travels in the channel is safe; if somebody tries to affect that data, that actor must break the tube or quantum channel. That causes disturbance in the electromagnetic fields. And the resistance in the channel structure. This tells the system that there is damage in the quantum channel. 

https://scitechdaily.com/engineers-bring-quantum-internet-to-commercial-fiber-for-the-first-time/

AI and the end of the world.

 AI and the end of the world. 

The end of the world can start. When the AI-controlled defense systems start to use weapons in a crisis.  In simulations. AI used weapons more sensitive than humans. This means that the AI is not suitable for making decisions in cases where the crisis has not yet escalated. Into weapon use. The AI can choose nuclear weapons more often than humans in those simulations. Here we can see one of the most frightening. And at the same time, interesting ways in which AI “thinks” about those simulations. 

The AI takes those simulations as a chess game or some other game. And the AI’s goal is to win the game. That means the AI takes the most effective and powerful weapons. Another thing is that the AI always selects the easiest models that are possible. There is one big difference between humans and AI. That difference is that the AI doesn’t think like we do. The AI doesn’t care about human victims. 

The only goal that the system has. It is to win the game. The AI plays these kinds of strategic simulations like it plays regular games. In the same way as some Atari chess simulations, the AI has certain points in losses when it takes a nuclear arsenal to use. When the AI reached a certain level of losses. It saw that it needed more firepower. The problem with the simulations is that they are never. Like real people. 

Simulating real crises is a little bit more difficult to create. Than some shooting games. Those systems require psychological aspects. The thing that causes uncertainty in those simulations is that AI or any human participants in those simulations don’t think like Putin or Trump. They don’t know how big a price real leaders are willing to pay. The lack of a psychological aspect is the thing. That causes problems with the AI. The AI plays to win the game, and the clearest way. To win the game is to destroy the opponent. This is the thing that causes very big problems. If somebody wants to negotiate, the AI will not recognize that action. 

There is a possibility that AI attacks anyway, because it analyzes actions that somebody plays over time and position to make an attack. The AI analyzes games like this: the side that has fewer points or units is losing. And that means the AI doesn’t think of casualties, like humans. It only thinks that the opponent must have fewer points. This makes AI dangerous. If it translates to negotiations and withdrawal causes a loss of points. That makes the AI attack enemies. The AI makes those things because it is programmed to keep its own points higher than its opponent's points. And that can cause a catastrophe in real life. 

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/09/02/pentagon-ai-nuclear-war-00496884

The mosaic model can be a novel approach to creating AI.

 The mosaic model can be a novel approach to creating AI. 

The regular model for creating AI is the large language model, or LLM. That means that. Developers must have control over large data masses. And large code structures. All large code structures are complicated. Because they involve a lot of code. And there are always some kind of errors in the code. That means, when the number of code lines increases, there are more possibilities to make errors. Making the AI is like making a statue. When the system turns more sophisticated. And more advanced, the development process turns slower. When we want to make statues, the first steps are always fast.

 But when we are closing the goal, finishing details takes more and more time. The finishing process just before the statue or product is ready for delivery to customers. Takes most of the time in the development process. The same way. Finishing and detecting errors from the data structure takes most of the time in the programming process. The problem is this: the LLM requires many event handlers. And each event handler is an independent algorithm. That means LLM is a large number of algorithms that operate as a whole. 

The problem is that the LLM rises like dough. That means there are more and more algorithms that must operate as one system. And when the code mass. And the data mass that the system operates on is both large. There can be lots of errors. The AI is a tool that can detect errors in other programs. But the system is not very effective if it must search for errors in its own code. The outsider algorithm can make error detection. AI needs a model. That it can compare its code to. With the code model. Actually, the outsider AI makes the comparison process with two other language models. 

And the problem is: when a new AI model comes. There are no models that the developers can compare their code to. Without models, it is impossible to compare even billions of code lines, which can involve minimal errors. But when there are billions of code lines, and let’s say. There is an error in 1000 lines; searching those codes is a long-term process. That requires carefulness. 

The modular, mosaic model helps expand the AI. 

The mosaic structure or the morphing neural network. That can involve multiple independently operating small language models. It can make it possible to make a flexible and elastic system. Every brick in the mosaic structure is an independently operating server that runs an independent small language model, SLM. Each SLM is a module that involves a certain skill. If the system doesn’t need a module. It can put the server that runs the module into sleeping mode. That makes it more energy efficient.  When developers want to give a new skill to the AI. They can make a new SLM and then connect. That thing to the entirety. 

Researchers say that the future belongs to small language models, SLMs. SLMs are lighter; they involve less code, which makes the development process easier to handle. The SLMs can also operate as a whole. This means: each SLM can operate independently. But those things can also form the virtual entirety. That entirety is like a mosaic. Each SLM has certain skills. When the user sends signals to the system, the SLM knows. If it has that skill or capacity. If the SLM doesn’t have a match. That system forwards the message to another language model, which has the database. That involves data about the SLMs and their skills. And the system sends that information to SLM, which can make the job. 

The idea is that each bite of the mosaic can be written independently. Which means developers can make new modules for AI. And then collect them into  a mosaic. The mosaic-type developing means that. Programmers can control the code better. That also decreases electric use, because if those modules or parts of the mosaic are not required, the system can put its servers to sleep. A mosaic model or morphing neural network structure allows developers to make an elastic and flexible system. 

The long-term data storage problem.

 The long-term data storage problem. 

When we think about long-term data storage. That resists electromagnetic radiation, magnetic fields, and physical damage, we can think about things like films, where data is stored in the form of barcodes. Those barcodes can be stored. In the microfilm, each frame can be protected using armored glass. The computer can read that data using the microfilm reader. If there is a CCD camera mounted in the system. The system can use a projector and the film. That barcode travels through that system. The computer can have a simple operating system that allows it to read those barcodes and then decode that data into the computer. The barcodes can have like two thin lines, which represent zero, and one wide line can represent one. The system can have certain code that tells the end of the program. 

Or code sequence ends. But if the system uses a geometrical form. like squares, triangles, crosses, and circles. That thing makes creating the new type of quantum communication possible. The square can be one, the triangle can be zero, and the circle can be the operator that tells that the code line or program’s code is ended. Basically, those geometrical shapes that the computer reads and transforms into programs can be letters. B can be 1, A can be 0. The system can take any letter group from the alphabet. The system requires marks to separate two zeros and show when the program ends. That makes the data system faster. 

The ability to store data in chemical form can be a game-changing way to store information. But can there be a practical way to make that thing? Sometimes futurologists say that they will store data in the DNA. molecule. And that is one of the most exciting ways to store data. Artificial cells can transmit that data into computers using bioluminescence, which flashes are ones and zeros. Or those artificial cells can send electric impulses to a computer. And that is one way to store information. But there is another way. To make chemical data storage. That doesn’t require the ability to code DNA molecules. 

One way is to use carbon-chloride molecules. Those chroride-carbon chains are flat. And there are  ways to make that thing. 

1) The choride-carbon chain is the one. And the intermediate is zero. Those molecules can be put under the glass. And then the system can read those molecules. The length of the intermediate determines. If there is a zero or a break. 

2) The system can involve two types of molecules. The first molecule is one, and the other one is zero. Those molecules can be stored under the glass plates, and the microscope reads data, which is stored in those molecules. 

3) The system could be faster if there were different molecules that show the zeros and ones. And if there is a molecule that shows the break. Or the endpoint of the code. There should be a separator that determines. When there are two zeros after each other. The system must also be separated. If the power is shut down or if there is only a break when the system waits for a new program. That makes those systems faster, and they don’t require a clock as much as electronic binary systems. 

A simple way to store data is to use images or a series of geometrical images to store and transmit data. The geometrical forms can be 1, 0, beak, and the end of the code line. Chemical and optical ways to transmit data. This is the thing. That makes data transportation safe. The data that is stored in the form of molecules can be transported using protein tapes. 

Activism as an influence tool.

 Activism as an influence tool.

Terror is a dirty tool in foreign politics. And terrorism is the most dramatic and aggressive form of activism. 

Many people think that activists are always operating domestically. The fact is that the KGB has always tried to use activists as a tool whose purpose is to break NATO. The peace activists got courses. And guidance from the Eastern European intelligence. Some activists got equipment. Like propaganda material. Guidance on legal methods, so that they could resist the police. And in some cases, the large activist groups got leaders, commissars. That was trained by the KGB. The KGB gave those people things like drugs that gave them their position as leaders of the gang. That propaganda material included images of dead children's bodies. The thing that the KGB forgot is that the Soviets also used napalm, cluster bombs, and extortion in Afghanistan and their other operations. Another thing that the Soviet Security police used was raping. 

Sexual violence’s mission was to make a canyon between the Germans and other occupied nations and Soviet troops. When the Soviet army occupied Eastern Europe and Eastern Germany, those people were classified as ideological enemies. That means Stalin’s headquarters wanted to prevent those ideological enemies from spreading their propaganda to Russian troops. And another thing was that. The soldiers who operated in the occupied territories must remain silent. So Stalin created one of the most disgusting tactics in the history of war. That thing was sexual violence. Rapings were things that created a distance between the Soviets and other people. The problem with the Red Army was that there was not enough political training to “resist that influence”. And that made this system, or apparat, a threat to Stalin. Or the purpose was to play good and bad cop. The good cop was the NKVD, the secret police. And the bad cpop was the Red Army. 

There are tales that commissars ordered their men to make those disgusting things. And sexual violence offered an excuse to put those men on court-martial and order the secret police to shoot them. In that case, Stalin must not say that the arrest was political. He must just show the crime. Stalin’s idea in that brutal game was simple. The Red Army committed crimes. And the political police were the thing. That supports and protects people. So the purpose of that brutal action is to make the secret police and state leaders look like good guys. And I think that Putin and the FSB follow the same route in Ukraine. 

But then to the modern days. 

Cyber is the new battlefield. And the cyber is the key to the next-generation propaganda and other psychological operations. The ability to break into information channels opens a route to hostile cyber influence against society. This makes it possible to share disinformation through trusted channels. That disinformation can be used to break relationships, support friendly politicians, and undermine trust in authorities. 

By recruiting NATO countries' citizens, it is easier for the FSB than to make strikes using their own people. If those foreigners. Friendly operators will be arrested . The FSB can claim. Those people operated on their own initiative. Making sabotage against things like electrical substations is not very difficult. People can throw stones at insulation or shoot those ceramic insulators using an AK-47. In the same way, if somebody jams aircraft navigation, it's easy to claim that those actions are only lies or a product of imagination. The key element in those operations is this: Everything is always denied. Foreign actors operate with minimal training. They can be criminals like narcomen who get drugs or guns from their services. 

Those activists are always poorly trained. Which makes them receptive to disinformation. Sometimes their leaders play professors or some kind of doctors, “who disagree with their university's values”. So they sold their houses and other things that they owned and went to search for “ a real world”. There in the far east, those people realize that communism is the only thing that is accepted. The real reason could be that those people used drugs or were fired because of pedophilia. 

Things like jamming aircraft navigation signals are meant to deliver fear. This kind of thing is used to give a signal that the decisions people made are not accepted. And if people give in, those attacks will end. This cheating is targeted against high-ranking deciders. The idea is that the terror will make them give in, and then they will escalate that throughout the entire society. This is why things like aircraft are excellent targets for that kind of influence. When terror is targeted at high-ranking leaders. That requires fewer resources. When we think that a leader has an automobile, it’s easy to put the paper on the windshield, there is text, “this could be the bomb”. 

Or the activists, as some media call them, can pop a tire from those cars. The fact is that the car is a good indicator. When some people use cars. Observers can follow those vehicles and then connect them to the person who is targeted by activists for that action. This is one way to influence leaders. 

The method in far wing radiacals is always the same. They use hybrid methods for recruiting. The idea is that most of the objects that those radicals support are acceptable. But some of them are not. Or their methods are not acceptable. The tool that those people use is fear. Their message is always that “they could be armed, and they remember your face”. In many cases, adult people lead underage actors. Adults tell youngsters what to do. Sometimes, there are pedophiles who are using those groups as sex objects. The idea is that sometimes the actors find people who have nothing to do. 

Then they offer things that give their lives a purpose. And then those outside, adult actors will raise the leaders of the gangs. They can offer drugs that help them to keep their position. The image is always the same. The adult leaders raise the sub-leaders in the group. This hierarchy makes things easier. First, they came to tell that it’s easier if only a couple of people come to take orders. And then those “chosen ones” will share the works with the activist groups. 

Those sub-leaders share orders, whose mission is to paint banderolles, and whose mission is to get transportation. Like bus tickets. Those leaders are marked with a different color. Those groups also have a kitchen team, which involves the cooks. And the people who collect garbage. And the people who work with garbage are the newbies or lowest-ranking members.  They should earn their promotions. But, as we know, some of those people are more liked than others. 

The idea in information operations, also called psychological operations, PSY-OPS, is that the hostile actors support actors who are useful to them. Those actors can be far-side nationalists. Or, selfish businessmen who want to do business with dictators. The useful actor is the actor that breaks the line at the front of the hostile actors. In cases like Russia, far-right nationalists serve the regime on both sides. 

The far-right nationalist government breaks NATO, and they also act as a tool that serves Moscow's propaganda machine. That propaganda introduces Russia as a nation, which is surrounded by hostile actors, whose purpose is to destroy Slavic culture. And the only thing that can protect this culture is Russia with its nuclear weapons. In Russia, nationalism serves the military and the high-ranking nomenklatura.