Neuralink microchips can eavesdrop on the neural system.

  Neuralink microchips can eavesdrop on the neural system. 

The Neuralink microchip is a tool. That can make paralyzed people live more fulfilling lives. Neuralin microchips are installed in the patient's brain. And they can be connected to the computers. That allows users to control the computer using their thoughts. That thing is a brain-computer interface (BCI). This connects the human brain straight to the net. That opens the path to control remote robots using EEG. Those systems' data security must be over the top. If those systems are hacked, the results can be devastating. 

That BCI interface allows a user to control the computers, mobile telephones, and all other electronics using that microchip. The computer is the key to controlling physical things. And that's why BCI is the key element to control physical tools. The idea of the BCI was introduced in the Graig Thomas novel "Firefox". In that novel and movie, the pilot controlled the super fighter's weapon systems using the BCI. 

The BCI system that allows the use of user interfaces using EEG is the tool that can make more than Graig Thomas's fictional system ever could. Firefox was written in 1977, and that means modern neuralink applications are bypassing that fiction. And the reality is turned more impressive than fiction. The AI and advanced data technology are turning fiction into fact. The AI-controlled microchips can transmit data to the brain. 

Darth Vader, a fictional character from the Star Wars movies, is one version of the human-robot hybrid. The BCI can make that thing possible. The bionic robot can be connected to the brain using the BCI. 

And that advances learning. The BCI system makes technical remote viewing possible. That happens by connecting those microchips to the surveillance cameras or robot bodies. The same system can allow people to transmit their sensorial data and other things to other people across the air. Those microchips have their ultimate risks. That risk is hacking. The AI-based systems can also use neuro-implanted mictochips to project a person's thoughts to the computer screen. 

The neuralink-type microchips that operate with Bluetooth allow the user to connect themselves. Straight into the internet using things like mobile telephones as sockets. The internet can make it possible for a person to transmit things like tastes, visual images, and the sense of touch over the net. 

The sense that the neuralink microchip transmits depends on the brain area where the chip is installed. That thing gives an ultimate experience that the brain cannot separate from personal experience. And that is the risk in those systems. Those microchips can also transmit things like other people's memories. Or maybe the AI can create synthetic memories that are the synthetic EEG curves. If those curves are sent to the right memory area in the brain. Our brain cannot separate those " synthetic memories" from real memories. 

The brain-implanted microchips are tools that can make things like a Darth Vader suit possible. Those microchips can control things like a bionic prosthesis. That thing means that the robot-human hybrids are possible. Brain-implanted microchips can make incredible things possible. But a technical advance can make it possible to use intelligent tattoos that are miniature microchips to communicate with the brain. Those very small microchips and antennas can give enough accuracy for the data transmission between the computer and neural structures. 

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/08/elon-musks-neuralink-launches-mind-control-chip-trials-in-uk-paralyzed-patients-become-human-guinea-pigs-in-this-shocking-experiment/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain%E2%80%93computer_interface

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firefox_(novel)

What is life?

   What is life? 

What is life? That's the thing that the cosmobiologists and philosophers are thinking. We have an old description that life means the thing that is organic and can create descendants. That means the robot that can build a copy of itself acts like a living organism. The organism means a creature. That can create descendants. Defend itself. And react to stimuli.  So, if volcanoes erupt, the robot can run away. 

So the living organisms can make a copy of themselves. However, when we consider concepts like Von Neumann machines or self-replicating machines, we encounter issues that warrant reflection, such as robot factories being viewed as "living organisms." The fact is that the robot factory can create copies of robots that operate inside those factories. And the robot factory can create a copy of itself. The problem with the Von Neumann machines is that. Those machines operate as a whole. Whenever. The robot creates an identical copy of itself, which doubles the network-based solution calculating capacity. 

If it has orders on how to make the needed equipment. These kinds of things, like AI-controlled, self-replicating robots, are tools. That requires the re-estimation of life. In the same way. Things like self-replicating molecules can cause a new way to see life. Von Neumann machines are tools that can act like living organisms. They can strike back if something attacks them. And that makes those machines more complicated things than we ever imagined.

The primary question is: does life need some physical form? Or what is the physical form? Computer viruses and artificial intelligence are programs that can make everything more complicated than ever before. The complicated AI algorithms can generate a twin of themselves. The AI that can develop itself and jump between servers is the thing that can make descendants. In the same way, computer viruses can make descendants. 

Is a self-replicating computer program some kind of living organism? That thing is a group or series of electromagnetic impulses. Stored in the computer's mass memory. That thing is like a living organism, but the problem is that it has no physical form as we know it. Another thing is this: is an artificial cell a living organism? Researchers made that cell in a laboratory. The thing is that the cell eats nutrients from its environment. But that artificial cell can't decay. 

So, even if something can drink orange juice, it will not necessarily create descendants. And another thing is that. Every biological creature doesn't think. But otherwise, the primitive creature can make many complicated things if they are programmed into its DNA. The intelligence doesn't make a creature living or not living. Biorobots or artificial cells are things. That causes a need to re-estimate the line between living organisms and robots. 

MIT's new robot learned by watching.

  MIT's new robot learned by watching. 

The new breakthrough in AI and robotics is a tool that can learn like humans. Those robots can look at the monitor and then learn and repeat those things. That means the robot is easier to teach, and no programming is needed. The ability to learn like humans makes robots more versatile. But the thing is that those robots are only one part of the AI-based tools. 

The robot can act as a medium that transmits data that it collects to the AI-central computers. And basically, the AI can learn things by using any camera system in the world. That gives the ultimate possibilities for the AI. If we think that the AI learns to drive, it's possible to use the robot as the medium. 

The robot sits in the classroom and drives a car following orders that the instructor gives. Then the system can transfer those models to the robot vehicles. Or, maybe the driver robot includes the service if somebody buys a robot car. The man-shaped robot can carry things like luggage to the car. And the same robot can wash the car and clean the house if its master wants. 

The problem with a human-shaped robot is that it can do the same things as a human. The human-shaped robots can learn things simply by looking at things on TV. That makes it possible to use the regular movies to train robots in civil and military actions. The thing is that the robot's shape must not look like a man, so that it learns things. The robot aircraft, or drone, or robot car can use the same methodology as a human-shaped robot to learn new tricks. 

Digital twins can make it easier to teach AIs. The digital twin can be the character that a person drives in computer game-type simulations. The digital twin can be the tool that helps to see how the system controls the real robot. The digital twin can also make it possible to advance reactions. That physical robots can face in their missions. The digital twin makes it possible for that system to advance AI. And test the AI and program's ability to respond to challenges. 

The AI can use things like aircraft or satellites to record maneuvers that potentially hostile actors make. Then the AI can drive those maneuvers in the digital simulation. Or simulate a battlefield and create counter-maneuvers to that thing. In the same way, the AI can collect data from the flight profiles of the aircraft, and then the system starts to create counter modes for that maneuver. This is the thing that makes the AI an effective tool in civil and military operations. 

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/08/that-robot-learned-just-by-being-watched-mits-terrifying-ai-builds-3d-control-map-from-video-alone-no-sensors-or-programming-needed/

https://scitechdaily.com/ai-twins-could-help-save-the-planet-but-only-if-we-fix-them-first/

AI and cartels.

 AI and cartels. 

Increasingly, more actions are being outsourced to AI. The stock market is a vast arena where individuals can utilize more or less sophisticated algorithms. The algorithm can see things. Like, changes in courses, like raising the value faster than a human. Then the AI-trainer must have the point where to sell and where to buy. The system must follow the small losses of the values and then decide to buy or sell. 

The AI must buy cheap shares and sell them when their value is high enough. The AI can follow more targets than a human. And it can see how the share values advance. If those shares are losing their value fast. And a person doesn't watch that curve, which causes losses. The AI will never get boring. And it ever sleeps. The case of the investor finds something else interesting: the screen on the table can cost millions in seconds. 

The AI can be a tool that solves those problems. But algorithms can exchange information illegally. The cartel means a situation in which a person uses an inner circle or non-public information to make profits from the stock market. 

And one version of cartels is a case. When traders make a contract to drive investments to certain targets. When somebody buys shares. That raises their values. So the group just dumps money into some target. The AI can also accidentally ask for advice from another AI. 

There can be a leading algorithm. That leader algorithm makes investments, and then other algorithms follow that thing. The fact is that,  even if some algorithms or AI chatbots look different, they can operate on the same platform. The AI chatbots can be the same, even if they seem different. And that thing means the AI can start to drive investments to certain objects. One AI-based solution can operate millions of investors' investments. 

This kind of AI can theoretically aim for even billions of dollars to the same target. And that thing makes it possible to raise the value of the shares. The AI is the tool that can react faster than humans. Criminals can create the AI-based investment cartels using quite simple algorithms. The AI that can control millions of objects in the bors can guarantee that a person cannot lose money in that game. The AI can invest small sums of money in a large group of targets. The system can buy and sell shares far faster than a human. So the person will always get profits. 

https://fortune.com/2025/08/01/artificial-stupidity-ai-trading-stock-market-behaviors-price-fixing-collusion-wharton-study/

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/artificial-stupidity-made-ai-trading-110500308.html

Can we trust AI?

 Can we trust AI? 

Artificial intelligence is a tool that doesn't create information from emptiness. That means the AI uses data and information that already exists. If something or somebody changes information from the data sources that the AI uses, the AI gives wrong answers. The AI can use old-fashioned information. In the same way, a human can take an old book of facts from the shelf. 

That is one thing that we must remember. The second thing is that most AI chatbots are owned by companies whose purpose is to bring profits for their owners. That causes a situation where some of the answers that the AI gives are customer-friendly. That means they are made to please customers, or people who pay for those chatbot services. 

However, one of the most important aspects of using AI is that it is actually utilized incorrectly. But the question is, why is it used? Because it makes work more effective. That means people who work with the AI assistants have no time to think and check the answers that the AI gives. The prime focus in AI use is that it makes people do more work. 

The modern business ecosystem has evolved over time, when all products were physical. That means the business ecosystem measures the effectiveness of the worker by simply calculating the number of work performances in a time unit. And that means the number of code lines that a programmer makes determines how effective that person is. And that means there is no time to analyze and think about the product that the AI makes. 

This is the problem with AI. It makes people more effective, and it should leave time to make analyses about the product. But the problem is that if the AI allows the person to work at double speed, that gives the company leaders the opportunity to fire half the workers. That decreases costs. 

When we talk about how AI makes things less effectively than a top-level programmer, we can find one very interesting question. If we analyze that argument closely, we face the claim that all programmers are top-level specialists. All programmers are top-level specialists. And another thing is that some workplaces are so hurried that they have no time to advise junior programmers. Sometimes old workers think that the young comrade is a competitor, and that makes the workplace atmosphere poisonous. 

The person might not dare to ask for advice from workmates. And that causes firing. The thing is that the AI is a tool that can help people. But we must remember that this tool allows us to analyze and think about new possibilities, only if we give it that chance. But we must have time and willingness to check the data that the AI gives. And if we see the AI only as a tool that allows us to cut the personnel costs, that is not the way to make our working life easier. 

If we just copy-paste texts that the AI makes. And don't even try to analyze that data, we don't increase trustworthiness in the company. That means we deliver the decisions to the AI. AI can also use old-fashioned datasets. Or it can use fake or falsified data. That means the AI makes mistakes in the same way as humans. It simply takes the wrong book from the shelf, and then that causes destruction or catastrophe. 

The AI is not immune to fake information. The problem with propaganda home pages is that their page rank are raised by drumming it with net queries. That makes those homepages easier to find. The problem with those pages is this: they use .com or some other neutral terminal identifiers. So, those homepages are not easy to connect to China or Russia. They are operated from servers that are in Western countries. The operators use a remote control to control those servers that operate in Western sockets. 

If the AI uses regular web browsing applications, that means it can select a propaganda page. The popular pages are always at the top of the page lists. And that thing means that the AI selects popular homepages. That decreases the AI's trustworthiness. The AI requires training. That training means that the users must set limits on what kind of sources those systems use. 

Is the universe made of information?

    Is the universe made of information?

Is the universe made of information?

Information exists only if we detect it.  But maybe we should call for information. That involves deliberate information as data. Deliberate information exists only if we detect it. 

The fact is that this thing depends on the way we think about information. We can think that all physical things are information. Or we can think. That information is an abstraction that makes something visible. Things like quantum technology are opening the vision about information as separated from material or physical particles. 

The physical particle can carry information. And then we can face things like electromagnetism as the information carriers. The electromagnetic field can carry information, or, in wave-particle duality, the electromagnetic field can transform or condense into a particle. 

Or a particle can turn into the electromagnetic field. That happens in annihilation. Information is independent of direct observation. We know that there are things like eagles, even if we don't see one of them ourselves. Another person can tell us that thing. So, in that case, the medium actor lets us know that there is something called an eagle. And if that person is inaccurate enough, we can even believe that there are eagles on Earth. Eagle is bird and they live somewhere, even if we don't see them. 

The question is, will the universe be a form of information? There is a lot of information about the universe. The thing is that the universe is like Schrödinger's cat. It forms of information and it doesn't form of information. The thing is this. We must determine the information before we can answer that question. If we want that information to mean something, that means the universe is not formed of information. But if information doesn't need to mean anything, that means information forms the universe. 

But if the information must make sense, the universe involves only meaningless oscillations and waves. So when we talk about things like black holes, we talk about information. That vanishes. Or, we talk about information that slides through the event horizon. In that case, the information means the particles and quantum fields that slide into the black hole. That means a black hole collects information, but we cannot reach it through the event horizon. 

The information is substantial, or substance. That means the existence of information depends on the information itself. The material is not a substance because its existence depends on the universe and quantum fields. Without those things, Materia turns into wave movement. But information doesn't need even the universe to exist. If some civilization can exist after the ultimate end of the universe, that civilization has knowledge of the universe. They have information about their past. And they can talk about the universe even if they didn't see it themselves. 

They can make clones of animals that lived in the universe. But for that work, those creatures require physical things. So, information itself cannot make anything. It can interact with the physical universe through sockets. Those sockets can be the DNA molecules that contain information. Those sockets or tensors that connect information with the physical world can be the bits in the computer's mass memory. 

But a computer cannot turn that information into a physical form. Without robots. Robots are tensors that allow computers to turn abstraction into reality. Materia can be destroyed. But information lives forever. Theoretical information can be reorganized into a new form. 

There must be some information stored in the system that the system can sort data into a new form. In human brains, memory cells are like the net eye. They can sort information from those cells into a new form with a very high accuracy. The reason for that is that there are so many small information dots that the brain can put into a new order. And the number of those memory dots determines how accurate that image is. The information can make sense. But that information must not have a match in the real world. 

Or, we just don't find that sense from the captured information. Or maybe we should call that thing signals. But are signals physical things? Maybe, maybe not. That means we capture radio signals from space that involve information about reactions in distant worlds. 

Is some other, intelligent civilization behind some of those radio signals? 

The answer is this: researchers have not detected any confirmed messages from another civilization. 

Or a shorter version is: nobody knows. There might be many messages that mean deliberate information. But researchers and AI don't detect those messages from natural radio signals. That means the search continues. And we are alone until we get an answer. We get an answer only if there is a message that comes from a confirmed alien source. Until that silence continues and the answer remains open. 

That is the problem with things like language science and especially the search for extraterrestrial intelligence, SETI. That means we might have billions of alien messages. But we cannot detect the information that those signals involve. 

Because. We don't know anything about the information systems that they have. So we cannot separate those messages from the cosmic background. That is one version of the theories why we don't have alien contact. That model goes like this. They cannot detect our messages, as we cannot detect their messages. And maybe we should be glad about that possibility. 

We call virtual information imagination. That information can seem very reasonable, like a human who walks on air. We know that thing is impossible, but in the virtual world in our brains, those things might seem very reasonable. Or at least we see those things while we sleep. 

In the human body, neurons connect information with physical things. Neurons use information to control muscles and other things. The information that we get exists only if we detect it. If we don't detect that information, it doesn't exist to us. 

https://thatsthenatureoftime.blogspot.com/

The AI in the helmet can revolutionize aviation and spaceflight.

  The AI in the helmet can revolutionize aviation and spaceflight. 

"Illustration of AI Model ChatGPT Navigating a Simulated Spacecraft in a Competition." (Rude Baguette)

Think about AI systems.  Like Chat GPT, as a robot controller. That tool will bring an ultimate boost for the robot that the controller can command using spoken language. But what if that tool is integrated into the aircraft and spacecraft? That can integrate multiple systems under one roof. And when commanders say that there is something. That must be removed; the user must not do anything but give the command. 

The system selects the closest robot that has the strength to make that movement. Robot groups can operate like ant swarms under AI control. The system can include flying units that can search for things for land-moving robot ants. 

What if the space suits are equipped with an AI socket that the system can call an assistant robot if there is something wrong? The future spacecraft can have things. Like assistant robots to make their missions go as they should. 

"The XQ-58A Valkyrie demonstrator, a long-range, high subsonic unmanned air vehicle completed its inaugural flight March 5, 2019 at Yuma Proving Grounds, Arizona." (Wikipedia)

"A XQ-58 Valkyrie deploys an Altius-600 unmanned aircraft system"(Wikpedia)

The AI that can fix errors in maneuvers can be a tool that makes many things safer. The real thing is the AI-controlled operating system in the combat aircraft. The system can integrate with multiple sensors. 

Such as satellites, other aircraft, and ground vehicles. Those sensors can be optical, radar, or acoustic sensors. The thing is that the AI-controlled systems can give flexibility to mission planning. And that kind of system can also make maneuvers in cases where the pilot has no time to react to every threat. The next-generation fighters are rather flight groups than individual systems.  

There are cruise missiles and other kinds of systems flying with those fighters. The drone can be a full-size fighter that can make autonomous attacks against targets. Or that robot fighter can also act in a kamikaze role. The new cruise missiles can also have the ability to refuel themselves in the air. Those missiles can have countermissiles, and they can make feint and instinct maneuvers, and change their speed and flight profiles during operations. And those missiles might have the ability to return to base if they are not needed. 

They must have the ability to communicate with drones and drone swarms. Those, maybe hypersonic aircraft, can drop drones to target areas, and those drones' missions can be to search targets, disturb air defense, and take out the electric supply. Those drones can also destroy things like fuel supply, and the AI-based systems can also target and assassinate enemy commanders. Those systems can be extremely dangerous in the wrong hands. 

https://automatedresearch.org/weapon/area-i-anduril-altius-600m-and-700m/

https://www.flightglobal.com/military-uavs/taiwan-receives-first-anduril-altius-600m-loitering-munitions/164081.article

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/08/chatgpt-at-the-helm-of-a-spaceship-could-change-space-travel-forever-after-stunning-early-successes/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kratos_XQ-58_Valkyrie

https://thatsthenatureoftime.blogspot.com/